What Good Is Title IX If No One Enforces It?
From California to Capitol Hill, girls are being sidelined—and the people we elected helped do it.
This weekend in California, a male athlete stood atop the high school girls' track and field podium—not once, but twice. The trans-identified athlete took first in the girls' high jump and triple jump, and second in long jump. Each girl was bumped up one spot—forced to share the podium with the male who took her place.
This wasn’t just another track meet—it became a political flashpoint. Protests erupted: a woman was removed for handing out “Save Girls’ Sports” bracelets, a man was arrested for attacking a women’s rights activist, and a plane overhead flew a banner reading “No Boys in Girls’ Sports.”
The timing couldn’t be more telling: yesterday, Secretary McMahon declared that the U.S. Department of Education is celebrating June as Title IX Month and “honoring 53 years of protecting women’s rights! Title IX defends against sex-based discrimination. Fairness, safety, and opportunity should be based on biological sex, not gender identity.” The Department of Education had already opened an investigation into California's policy earlier this year, and just one business day after the championship controversy, the Department of Justice issued a formal letter declaring CIF’s bylaw unconstitutional. Even so, state officials did not bar Hernandez from competing. Instead, they rewrote the medal ceremony protocols to smooth over the backlash...which shows you where their priorities lie.
This isn’t just a California story, it’s a warning for every state.
Two weeks ago, I joined women from across the political spectrum—radical feminists, lesbian advocates, concerned mothers—via Skype for meetings with the offices of Georgia Senators Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff. We were part of a coalition led by Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF), joined by WDI USA, LGB Alliance, and Roar Women NYC. Constituents, like me, set up the meetings to engage any representative willing to listen. We came armed with evidence—well-documented studies, data, and a simple ask: defend our sex-based rights. Many Democratic offices canceled. Others mocked. Thankfully, mine agreed to meet.
In my opening remarks, I stated:
“I’m a Georgia constituent and a supporter of the Women’s Liberation Front, a radical feminist group that advocates for the safety, dignity, and equality of women and girls… We’re seeking partnership because, while both parties talk about supporting women, the policies often fall short.”
In March, months before our meeting, the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act came up—legislation that would’ve ensured school sports remain single-sex—and Ossoff and Warnock didn’t just vote no—they blocked it from reaching the floor after both of their offices dodged my requests for a meeting regarding the issue. The House passed it with bipartisan support. But Georgia’s own senators killed the chance for President Trump to sign it into law.
These men, who style themselves as champions of civil rights and equality and proud fathers of girls (Ossoff x 2), refused to protect the rights of female athletes to fair competition. Ossoff's team claimed he supports female sports, but said he opposed the bill over concerns about invasive gender-testing—recycling the tired “checking genitals” red herring. Staffers from both offices made it clear they were "hearing from both sides of this debate".
They sided with the NCAA. With the Biden administration’s grotesque rewrite of Title IX. With the bureaucrats pushing testosterone-suppressed males into girls’ teams, girls’ locker rooms, and girls’ scholarships.
The Science Is Clear—And So Is the Harm
According to the Independent Women’s report on Title IX and women’s sports, which I also forwarded to the staffers, biological males maintain overwhelming athletic advantages even after years of testosterone suppression:
40% more muscle mass
30% greater strength
20% faster acceleration
Lower injury risk and higher endurance
This isn’t a “debate.” It’s a documented reality. These facts meant nothing to our Senators earlier this year—hopefully that will change after the WoLF-led meetings where extensive data was shared on the issue.
Every lane a ‘Lia Thomas’ swims is a lane taken from a woman. Every male on a roster benches a girl. Every male MVP in women’s events sends the message that women don’t matter.
“Trust the Science”? Tell That to Jasmine Clark.
Democrats in Georgia love to claim the mantle of science and representation. State Rep. Jasmine Clark, a PhD microbiologist, just launched a campaign for Congress in my Congressional district—on a platform of “reason, science, and families.”
But when it comes to the most basic scientific truth—that men and women are biologically different—will she stand up for girls' sports? For female-only locker rooms? For accurate, sex-based language in law? Her track record in the Georgia state legislature suggests she won't. In fact, she's already echoed the same bad-faith distractions we hear from others in her party—raising concerns about "checking genitals" as a way to deflect from the real issue: protecting the integrity and fairness of women’s sports.
Because just like her primary opponents Emanuel Jones and Everton Blair, Clark is campaigning on a platform of louder resistance, not better policy. And despite their impressive academic credentials, each of them will likely dodge the question—pretending not to know what a woman is when it comes to enshrining our sex-based rights in law.
Warnock for President? Not If Women Remember This.
Senator Warnock, now the subject of 2028 presidential speculation, wants you to believe he’s “focused on the task in front of us.” But his record is already written: he failed to protect girls when it counted.
And Jon Ossoff? He’s up for reelection in 2026. Right now, Republicans are scrambling to find a “unicorn” candidate who can bridge Trump’s base and Kemp’s coalition. But you don’t need a unicorn when the incumbent has betrayed half the electorate. Ossoff may have $11 million in the bank. But women have numbers, and we have voices. And we’re done handing out our votes like party favors to men who won’t defend our rights.
Call Them Out. And Then Vote Them Out If Needed.
Public disappointment isn’t enough. Calling out your senator is a good first step. But when they betray women, withholding your vote is the only message they understand.
🍑 CALL OUT SENATOR OSSOFF for failing to stand with women
🍑 CALL OUT SENATOR WARNOCK for voting against women’s sports
Georgia women deserve better than performative progressivism. We deserve public servants who know what a woman is—and who aren’t afraid to say it.
To every politician who thinks our rights are negotiable, or that women will stay silent out of party loyalty, hear this loud and clear:
We’re not just watching. We’re voting.
Many, many thanks for keeping up the pressure with this call to action. I have restacked.
“Withholding” your vote is a half measure. VOTE FOR, WORK FOR, CAMPAIGN FOR Republicans if you want to make a real difference. I have been a registered Democrat for 50 years, and that is what I will be doing.